« Android video codec benchmark | Home | Creating Debian packages (properly) using debhelper »
Android native AudioTrack vs amem performance
By admin | March 11, 2012
VLC for Android pre-alpha benchmarks (March 11, 2012) for two audio outputs. Specs and method are the same as in the audio benchmarks.
Sample
First 30 seconds of testfile.mp3
Results
| amem Mean: 13.24% Median: 11.30% Mode: 10.7% |
Native AudioTrack Mean: 11.87% Median: 10.40% Mode: 10.7% |
amem
PID PPID USER STAT VSZ %MEM CPU %CPU COMMAND Pass 1: D/vlc ( 3253): using audio output module "amem" 3253 957 10076 S 163m 88.3 0 22.7 org.videolan.vlc 3253 957 10076 S 161m 87.2 0 11.5 org.videolan.vlc 3253 957 10076 S 161m 87.2 0 10.7 org.videolan.vlc 3253 957 10076 S 161m 87.2 0 11.9 org.videolan.vlc 3253 957 10076 S 161m 87.2 0 11.3 org.videolan.vlc 3253 957 10076 S 161m 87.2 0 10.2 org.videolan.vlc Pass 2: D/vlc ( 3366): using audio output module "amem" 3366 957 10076 R 164m 88.7 0 23.7 org.videolan.vlc 3366 957 10076 S 161m 87.5 0 11.7 org.videolan.vlc 3366 957 10076 S 161m 87.5 0 11.7 org.videolan.vlc 3366 957 10076 S 161m 87.5 0 10.5 org.videolan.vlc 3366 957 10076 S 161m 87.5 0 11.1 org.videolan.vlc 3366 957 10076 S 161m 87.5 0 10.9 org.videolan.vlc Pass 3: D/vlc ( 3590): using audio output module "amem" 3590 957 10076 S 164m 89.1 0 25.6 org.videolan.vlc 3590 957 10076 S 164m 89.1 0 12.3 org.videolan.vlc 3590 957 10076 S 164m 89.1 0 11.3 org.videolan.vlc 3590 957 10076 S 164m 89.1 0 10.5 org.videolan.vlc 3590 957 10076 S 164m 89.1 0 10.1 org.videolan.vlc 3590 957 10076 S 164m 89.1 0 10.7 org.videolan.vlc
AudioTrack
PID PPID USER STAT VSZ %MEM CPU %CPU COMMAND Pass 1: D/vlc ( 2835): using audio output module "android_audiotrack" 2835 957 10076 S 159m 86.0 0 10.1 org.videolan.vlc 2835 957 10076 S 159m 86.0 0 10.4 org.videolan.vlc 2835 957 10076 S 159m 86.0 0 9.5 org.videolan.vlc 2835 957 10076 S 159m 86.0 0 9.4 org.videolan.vlc 2835 957 10076 S 159m 86.0 0 9.8 org.videolan.vlc 2835 957 10076 S 159m 86.0 0 9.2 org.videolan.vlc Pass 2: D/vlc ( 2948): using audio output module "android_audiotrack" 2948 957 10076 S 165m 89.5 0 23.5 org.videolan.vlc 2948 957 10076 S 164m 88.7 0 11.1 org.videolan.vlc 2948 957 10076 S 164m 88.7 0 10.4 org.videolan.vlc 2948 957 10076 S 164m 88.7 0 10.7 org.videolan.vlc 2948 957 10076 S 164m 88.7 0 9.6 org.videolan.vlc 2948 957 10076 S 164m 88.7 0 10.7 org.videolan.vlc Pass 3: D/vlc ( 3120): using audio output module "android_audiotrack" 3120 957 10076 S 163m 88.4 0 25.8 org.videolan.vlc 3120 957 10076 S 160m 86.8 0 10.7 org.videolan.vlc 3120 957 10076 S 160m 86.8 0 10.3 org.videolan.vlc 3120 957 10076 S 160m 86.8 0 10.7 org.videolan.vlc 3120 957 10076 S 160m 86.8 0 10.2 org.videolan.vlc 3120 957 10076 S 160m 86.8 0 11.5 org.videolan.vlc
Conclusion
Although there is not much of a significant gain in either audio output, the AudioTrack output feels a bit more stable to the end-user with less glitchiness or stuttering. In addition, AudioTrack supports some formats not supported by amem output (such as mono audio).
If you found this article helpful or interesting, please help Compdigitec spread the word. Don’t forget to subscribe to Compdigitec Labs for more useful and interesting articles!
Topics: Mobile | 12 Comments »
July 4th, 2024 at 19:04
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/03/11/android-native-audiotrack-vs-amem-performance/ […]
July 8th, 2024 at 20:56
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/03/11/android-native-audiotrack-vs-amem-performance/ […]
July 18th, 2024 at 19:28
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/03/11/android-native-audiotrack-vs-amem-performance/ […]
July 20th, 2024 at 20:05
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/03/11/android-native-audiotrack-vs-amem-performance/ […]
August 9th, 2024 at 02:43
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/03/11/android-native-audiotrack-vs-amem-performance/ […]
August 25th, 2024 at 21:57
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 5920 more Info on that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/03/11/android-native-audiotrack-vs-amem-performance/ […]
September 9th, 2024 at 20:36
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/03/11/android-native-audiotrack-vs-amem-performance/ […]
September 9th, 2024 at 21:43
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 7605 more Information to that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/03/11/android-native-audiotrack-vs-amem-performance/ […]
September 16th, 2024 at 21:00
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/03/11/android-native-audiotrack-vs-amem-performance/ […]
September 22nd, 2024 at 19:07
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/03/11/android-native-audiotrack-vs-amem-performance/ […]
October 1st, 2024 at 22:40
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/03/11/android-native-audiotrack-vs-amem-performance/ […]
October 13th, 2024 at 05:43
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/03/11/android-native-audiotrack-vs-amem-performance/ […]