« Android video codec benchmark | Home | Creating Debian packages (properly) using debhelper »
Android native AudioTrack vs amem performance
By admin | March 11, 2012
VLC for Android pre-alpha benchmarks (March 11, 2012) for two audio outputs. Specs and method are the same as in the audio benchmarks.
Sample
First 30 seconds of testfile.mp3
Results
| amem Mean: 13.24% Median: 11.30% Mode: 10.7% |
Native AudioTrack Mean: 11.87% Median: 10.40% Mode: 10.7% |
amem
PID PPID USER STAT VSZ %MEM CPU %CPU COMMAND Pass 1: D/vlc ( 3253): using audio output module "amem" 3253 957 10076 S 163m 88.3 0 22.7 org.videolan.vlc 3253 957 10076 S 161m 87.2 0 11.5 org.videolan.vlc 3253 957 10076 S 161m 87.2 0 10.7 org.videolan.vlc 3253 957 10076 S 161m 87.2 0 11.9 org.videolan.vlc 3253 957 10076 S 161m 87.2 0 11.3 org.videolan.vlc 3253 957 10076 S 161m 87.2 0 10.2 org.videolan.vlc Pass 2: D/vlc ( 3366): using audio output module "amem" 3366 957 10076 R 164m 88.7 0 23.7 org.videolan.vlc 3366 957 10076 S 161m 87.5 0 11.7 org.videolan.vlc 3366 957 10076 S 161m 87.5 0 11.7 org.videolan.vlc 3366 957 10076 S 161m 87.5 0 10.5 org.videolan.vlc 3366 957 10076 S 161m 87.5 0 11.1 org.videolan.vlc 3366 957 10076 S 161m 87.5 0 10.9 org.videolan.vlc Pass 3: D/vlc ( 3590): using audio output module "amem" 3590 957 10076 S 164m 89.1 0 25.6 org.videolan.vlc 3590 957 10076 S 164m 89.1 0 12.3 org.videolan.vlc 3590 957 10076 S 164m 89.1 0 11.3 org.videolan.vlc 3590 957 10076 S 164m 89.1 0 10.5 org.videolan.vlc 3590 957 10076 S 164m 89.1 0 10.1 org.videolan.vlc 3590 957 10076 S 164m 89.1 0 10.7 org.videolan.vlc
AudioTrack
PID PPID USER STAT VSZ %MEM CPU %CPU COMMAND Pass 1: D/vlc ( 2835): using audio output module "android_audiotrack" 2835 957 10076 S 159m 86.0 0 10.1 org.videolan.vlc 2835 957 10076 S 159m 86.0 0 10.4 org.videolan.vlc 2835 957 10076 S 159m 86.0 0 9.5 org.videolan.vlc 2835 957 10076 S 159m 86.0 0 9.4 org.videolan.vlc 2835 957 10076 S 159m 86.0 0 9.8 org.videolan.vlc 2835 957 10076 S 159m 86.0 0 9.2 org.videolan.vlc Pass 2: D/vlc ( 2948): using audio output module "android_audiotrack" 2948 957 10076 S 165m 89.5 0 23.5 org.videolan.vlc 2948 957 10076 S 164m 88.7 0 11.1 org.videolan.vlc 2948 957 10076 S 164m 88.7 0 10.4 org.videolan.vlc 2948 957 10076 S 164m 88.7 0 10.7 org.videolan.vlc 2948 957 10076 S 164m 88.7 0 9.6 org.videolan.vlc 2948 957 10076 S 164m 88.7 0 10.7 org.videolan.vlc Pass 3: D/vlc ( 3120): using audio output module "android_audiotrack" 3120 957 10076 S 163m 88.4 0 25.8 org.videolan.vlc 3120 957 10076 S 160m 86.8 0 10.7 org.videolan.vlc 3120 957 10076 S 160m 86.8 0 10.3 org.videolan.vlc 3120 957 10076 S 160m 86.8 0 10.7 org.videolan.vlc 3120 957 10076 S 160m 86.8 0 10.2 org.videolan.vlc 3120 957 10076 S 160m 86.8 0 11.5 org.videolan.vlc
Conclusion
Although there is not much of a significant gain in either audio output, the AudioTrack output feels a bit more stable to the end-user with less glitchiness or stuttering. In addition, AudioTrack supports some formats not supported by amem output (such as mono audio).
If you found this article helpful or interesting, please help Compdigitec spread the word. Don’t forget to subscribe to Compdigitec Labs for more useful and interesting articles!
Topics: Mobile | 5 Comments »
March 27th, 2025 at 20:27
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/03/11/android-native-audiotrack-vs-amem-performance/ […]
March 27th, 2025 at 22:49
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/03/11/android-native-audiotrack-vs-amem-performance/ […]
March 29th, 2025 at 15:11
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/03/11/android-native-audiotrack-vs-amem-performance/ […]
March 29th, 2025 at 21:07
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 44704 additional Information to that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/03/11/android-native-audiotrack-vs-amem-performance/ […]
April 16th, 2025 at 22:25
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on on that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/03/11/android-native-audiotrack-vs-amem-performance/ […]